|
For those not running V3R7or V4Rx here's an example of the screen from WRKSHRPOOL (F11) that Al is referring to (fixed font): Work with Shared Pools System: NTBLOWS Main storage size (K) . : 131072 Type changes (if allowed), press Enter. -----Size %----- -----Faults/Second----- Pool Priority Minimum Maximum Minimum Job Maximum *MACHINE 1 24.22 45.00 10.00 .00 10.00 *BASE 1 7.81 80.00 5.00 .50 200 *INTERACT 2 5.00 75.00 10.00 2.00 100 *SPOOL 3 .76 5.00 5.00 1.00 100 *SHRPOOL1 2 1.00 100 10.00 2.00 100 *SHRPOOL2 2 1.00 100 10.00 2.00 100 *SHRPOOL3 2 1.00 100 10.00 2.00 100 *SHRPOOL4 2 1.00 100 10.00 2.00 100 *SHRPOOL5 2 1.00 100 10.00 2.00 100 *SHRPOOL6 2 1.00 100 10.00 2.00 100 Also, in a previous post someone claimed that QPFRADJ tuning only made changes every 15 minutes. Well, that may have been the case back in V1. I believe the correct time interval now is every 20 seconds. I agree with Al - I think QPFRADJ has gained a bad reputation that in many cases is now no longer deserved. Neil Palmer AS/400~~~~~ NxTrend Technology - Canada ____________ ___ ~ Thornhill, Ontario, Canada |OOOOOOOOOO| ________ o|__||= Phone: (905) 731-9000 x238 |__________|_|______|_|______) Cell.: (416) 565-1682 x238 oo oo oo oo OOOo=o\ Fax: (905) 731-9202 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mailto:NPalmer@NxTrend.com http://www.NxTrend.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Al Barsa, Jr. [SMTP:barsa2@ibm.net] > Sent: Sunday, February 22, 1998 2:51 PM > To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com > Subject: Re: Performance tuning suggestions > > At 11:53 PM 2/21/98 -0500, you wrote: > >>Spankedy, spank! Yes, performance opinions are like (well, you > know) and > >>others will probably disagree (although the latter seem to always > have a > >>maxed-out system) _HOWEVER_, I _STRONGLY DISAGREE_ with setting any > value > for > >>QPFRADJ other than ZERO (zip, null, nada) for a 9406 system. > > > >>Dean Asmussen > > Sorry Dean. I strongly disagree. If your system is adequately sized > (and > with the recently announced price/performance of the new models, > there's no > excuse for an undersized system anymore). QPFRADJ should be set to 3. > Note however, when doing an upgrade (CPU, CISC to RISC, or adding > memory), > you must change it to 2 for the first IPL. > > I have systems as small as a D10 and as large as the largest 650 in > the > world that work well with this set to 3. BTW, the the latest > announcements, every RISC AS/400 currently being sold is a 9406, > except for > the model 150 which is a 9401. > > This is a controversal point. You may not realize it, but IBM is > improving > autp tuning with every release! If you haven't looked recently, do a > WRKSHRPOOL command, and then do an F11! > > Give it a try. > > Al > > > > Al Barsa, Jr. - Account for Midrange-L > +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com". | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.