RE: Win95 - CA/400 session limit

Hans,

We are suppose to report to Microsoft when Windows goes down?!?!

I always thought it was a "feature"!!!  :-)

HaHaHaHa,
        Scott P. Johnson

----------
From:   Hans Boldt[SMTP:boldt@ca.ibm.com]
Sent:   Wednesday, February 18, 1998 7:25 AM
To:     midrange-l@midrange.com
Subject:        RE: Win95 - CA/400 session limit

Hi Chris!  I couldn't agree more with your arguments!
I've been watching this debate for years now with great
interest.  Recently, I bought a new computer for home
that came pre-installed with WNT.  I thought, okay, it
can't be as bad as some people say, so why not give it
a try.  So, in the weeks before delivery, I read what I could
about it.  The result of that reading was that WNT only
stayed on for a day before being replaced by OS/2!  (It
would have been sooner, but the computer came the
same day as my bowling night!)

My question for Windows users is this:  When your
Windows system goes down, what severity do you
put on the APAR report to Microsoft?

Hans Boldt, ILE RPG Development, IBM Toronto Lab, boldt@ca.ibm.com

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---