|
Hello, I just left a company where I undertook to do a complete date alteration back in 1992, the entire system was thoroughly Y2K ready within a year. I am now working at a company that has "questionable" software and this is the plan at this company..to do the minimum (The CEO does want to rewrite the whole thing, but does not want to attempt it with such a small window. Just find the bad situations and ride out the others, after all this companies entire product cycle life is 8 - 12 hours so dates aren't too intensive, and they have absolutely no forcasting ability at this time. So I guess "Only time will tell" -- :-) Tim & Dana Truax (-: Wawrzaszek wrote: > Y2K food for thought: > As all companies are doing, we are evaluating what to do for the year > Y2K. So > my bottom line question is why not just change those applications that > absolutely have to be changed to work, and "ride out" the rest of the > programs. root +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com". | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.