× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Win95 vs Lose95
  • From: DAsmussen@xxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 23:53:35 EST

John,

In a message dated 98-02-06 02:06:39 EST, you write:

<<snip>>
> I'm sitting at home with a Lose95(read WIN95) machine without CA and it
>  locks up at least 3 times a night.  Don'tcha think a multi-gazillion dollar
>  company who spent 5(is it 10?) years developing this thing, could make it
>  not lock up just because a single app hangs?
<<snip>>

Probably closer to 15.  I'm suprised IBM hasn't sued over some of the
components' similarity to the "inferior" OS/2...

JMHO,

Dean Asmussen
Enterprise Systems Consulting, Inc.
Fuquay-Varina, NC  USA
E-Mail:  DAsmussen@aol.com

"A true friend is someone who's there for you when he'd rather be anywhere
else." -- Len Wein
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.