|
on 02/05/98at 09:35 AM, our friend Mark Welte <MWelte@dmtn.com> said: >Normally, I would agree with you about the mystery originating with >Rochester, MN. But lately, I've come to believe that not everything that >goes wrong with Client Access is IBM's fault. That is my experience too. Troubles seem to vary by patch-level of win 95, not by level of Client Access. Machines without troubles begin to have CA troubles when a new MS upgrade or change is made. ---------------------------------------------------- Booth Martin --------------------------------------------------- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com". | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
