Re: CISC to RISC - why not FRCOBJCVT on reload? -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Someone wrote:
Yes- I should have mentioned we did FRCOBJCVN using SAVRST over a token
ring LAN, not a tape drive.

Peter H. O'Connor wrote:
> Doing Object conversion is not advisable during the restore.  First of
all>
> most system that do this have a time out problem with the tape drive,
ugh.>

One can do object conversion using the SAVRST command.  However, that is a
single threaded job and takes a long time.  If time is of no importance, do
object conversion what ever way you want.  Most people don't have time to
waste.

Peter H. O'Connor
PAE Inc.
7 Riverway Rd.
Salem, MA 01970-5343
978-744-8612(T)
978-745-7945(F)
e-mail 102736.3535@compuserve.com
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.