Re: sorting scheduled jobs in a jobq

["Jeffrey M. Carey" <jeffreycarey@xxxxxxx>]

That's what I meant!  oops!  

I do think its possible that a there might be enough of a lag between
when a job is assigned a number and when it shows up on a jobq that they
could get out of order.  Since another post mentioned that this is
documented (making a "feature" instead of a "bug"), I was just trying to
suggest why.  

Still, best way to control the order stuff runs in is to submit it to a
single threaded jobq with a unique priority.

Gord Hutchinson wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 19 Nov 1997 11:22:39 -0500, you wrote:
> 
> >Also keep in mind that the job number is assigned when the job starts,
> >so maybe the first job just happens to take a microsecond longer to get
> >to the que, so it has to go after the second.
> >
> Ah,, I think the job number is assigned when the job enters the system
> (ie: is submitted).
> 
> Gord
> 
> --
> Gord Hutchinson
> TNT Overland Express
> ghutchinson@tntoverland.com
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com
> |    and specify 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
> +---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---