• Subject: Re: Build Timestamp?
  • From: boothm@xxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 28 Sep 97 12:00:45 -0400
  • In-Reply-To: <c=GB%a=Infonet%p=Tengizchevroil%l=TENGIZCHEV/KZSITE01/00069C0F@kz-tz-hv-msx01.ten

on 09/28/97at 12:15 PM, the Great and Grand  Wazir "Kahn, David"
<KAHN@tengizchevroil.com> said:

The TIME opcode requires a numeric result field. Crazy though it sounds
you cannot TIME straight into a timestamp field.

ummmm.... errrr.... I just did TIME into an LDATE field. I am not near a
AS/400 so I can't check again but I'd have bet up to a dime that it worked
ok.  I know I saw the correct output.  

Now you got me muttering to myself.   What the heck, where's the Champion
for LDATEs, Carr.  He's the one that just talked me into using LDATE
again.   Now your saying TIME doesn't work?  damn. damn. damn.
Booth Martin       Contract Programming, Inc.

| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com
|    and specify 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2021 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.