× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: WRKACTJOB?
  • From: "Jeffrey M. Carey" <jeffreycarey@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 18:08:40 -0500
  • Organization: MTI Vacations

No I don't think so, because the activity levels sure look like the
average over that time period - the only way it could do this is by
running in the background.  Try this to test it sometime - do a
WRKACTJOB.  F3.  Submit a batch job you know uses CPU.  Let it run for a
few minutes, then hold it.  Do another WRKACTJOB.  The batch job shows
non-zero CPU utilization - the only way that could happen is if
statistica are being captured from the time of the first WRKACTJOB,
since once the job is held,. it's CPU util. is 0.

I think this goes for WRKSYSSTS too.

Robert Dobrowolski wrote:
> 
> The elapsed time could just be a calculation of the time between the
> current time and a stored value (in QTEMP?) of the last time the
> WRKACTJOB values were retrieved for this session.  I always thought that
> WRKACTJOB only had an effect on the system while the values were being
> refreshed or reset.  During this time, it is a BIG user of resources,
> but otherwise is dormant, much like any other interactive job.
> 
> JMHO, Bob Dobrowolski
> 
> >----------
> >From:  Jeffrey M. Carey[SMTP:jeffreycarey@usa.net]
> >Sent:  Friday, September 26, 1997 12:25 PM
> >To:    MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> >Subject:       Re: WRKACTJOB?
> >
> >I have heard that WRKACTJOB does continue to run in the background as
> >long as the job that called it is active - even if you exit the
> >command.  The best evidence for this is the "Elapsed time" field.  Do a
> >WRKACTJOB, F3, wait a few minutes and do another WRKACTJOB.  The
> >"Elapsed time" will show the total time since the first WRKACTJOB - so
> >something must be collecting information during that time.
> >+---
> >| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> >| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
> >| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com
> >|    and specify 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message.
> >| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
> >+---
> >
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com
> |    and specify 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
> +---
> umidr
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com
|    and specify 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.