• Subject: Re: Record locking (was: commitment or journaling)
  • From: boothm@xxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 20 Sep 97 10:39:10 -0400
  • In-Reply-To: <c=GB%a=Infonet%p=Tengizchevroil%l=TENGIZCHEV/KZSITE01/0005EDA9@kz-tz-hv-msx01.ten

on 09/20/97 at 09:35 AM, "Kahn, David" <KAHN@tengizchevroil.com> said:

How about putting the user's comments into a data queue and letting a
single server program add them to the detail file, assigning the next
available sequence number in each case? That takes care of adding
comments. Now, what happens when they need to be updated? Because the
comments all belong together it's not just a case of single record

Would it be useful if the original sequencing was by tens or hundreds,
like SEU does it? Then one knows that the seq.# xxxxxx00 is the start of a
new comment block?

Booth Martin       Contract Programming, Inc.

| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com
|    and specify 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com

This thread ...

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].