|
> > Art wrote: > > During the UPS strike, a customer of mine called Monday morning that he > > had just landed a major account. He needed some software changes > > immediately. One of the changes required adding a field to a file. > > Should I tell the customer that changes to the database require more > > care than that, turn down the business? No. It has to be done. Just > > do it (That's a great slogan, someone should use that) > > > > Got to go with LVLCHK(*NO). Remember to compile all programs that add > > or update that file. It'll work smooth. > > > > Art (seat of my pants) Tostaine, Jr. > Dean wrote: > Those pants must be awfully tight! ARE YOU NUTS????!!!! How does CHGPF > alter this over just adding the field and compiling the file (other than > making sure you save the data)? How does the speed difference between > compiling the file and using CHGPF make or break taking the customer's > business? How much MONEY is the customer going to lose because YOU > missed a program that added to or updated the file? THAT's what LVLCHK is > >FOR!!! > > If you already know what programs add/update the file, why DON'T you know > which ones access it at all (HINT: DSPPGMREF to an outfile)? If you know > both, what the heck is the big deal with re-compiling them ALL? Yes database > changes require careful consideration, but simply adding a field is NOT > rocket science! > > I disagree VEHEMENTLY with using LVLCHK(*NO) under ANY circumstances. I'll > make the same challenge that I did with GOTO -- show me a SINGLE example > under which it would be valid, and I'll admit my mistake (haven't gotten one > in almost a year on GOTO yet, but you're welcome to try with LVLCHK). > Otherwise, I've still got a couple of customers with S/34's in their > warehouse that they're trying to get rid of -- ITS database should suit you > just fine...IF you can afford the electricity to run it :-). Users needed a field added to the item master to track an atrribute of that item. They needed it ASAP (At least they thought so). I knew which programs updated (add/change) and which ones just used it. I did exactly what Art did. Recompiling all of the programs, moving to another system and installing would have been a huge drain on resources. Although I did recompile and install all of them on the following weekend. Joe Teff QDS Bloomington, MN +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com". | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com | and specify 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.