|
Vern, It's even better, like when you goto do a download in CA95 and the files download in the wrong format (BECAUSE THE F'ING INSTALL PROC DIDN'T PUT A ONE LINE FILE IN THE WINDOWS DIR)...BUT to find that out you have to PAY for a support line contract for them to tell you it's a bug and create this one liner...meanwhile, you've wasted some more of your client's bucks and they've had to buy a support line for error support... Uh, frankly as for your hope...well...You've got a better chance at a "hot date" with Sandra Bullock... :) Don in DC metro...and yeah, I'm pissed as hell at this kinda *&^%! PS, btw, did the fax/400 "guru's" add any functionality on the new v4.x rls of os/400???? Been NEEDING to send more than 1 splf in a call for 5 YEARS now.... On Fri, 5 Sep 1997, Vern Hamberg wrote: > Hi Bob, > > Here we are again--finger-pointing forever. > > I have a couple situations at work that sound like the script you published > here. One is a Dell laptop that works fine in a docking station connected > to our Novell network. When I install CA95 it hangs at the network signon > window. Take CA95 off, it works fine. I call the Family and get the 'not > supported' crap (pardon me). I say, "The machine works fine without CA95. > It hangs when CA95 goes on. It works fine again when CA96 is taken off. > Duh! What's different?" > > Recently one of our people heard, at an IBM presentation here, that IBM was > no longer in the finger-pointing game. My experience is that the CA people > haven't heard the message yet. > > I'd mentioned to you another example here-a PC on which I wanted to install > only the ODBC driver. It turns out that you cannot put on only the driver, > you have to install the entire Base portion of CA95. (Shout to follow) THIS > REALLY STINKS! (I'm calm now). > And when I install CA95 on this machine, it locks up, again around the > network signon window, not allowing password entry. Again, what's different > here? > > CA support will gladly tell you to arrange for a ConsultLine contract, and > IF the problem turns out to be CA, we don;t have to pay for it. THIS ALSO > STINKS, IMO. (Oops, lost it again-sorry) > > I've put this on the list, 'cuz the more that hear it, maybe the more IBM > will do something--I hope. > > To repeat, it is not possible to install only the ODBC driver, without the > entire Base portion of CA. CA is the only ODBC provider that works this > way, AFAIK. It _is_ a good driver, but this restriction is really frustrating. > > Cheers > > Vernon Hamberg > Systems Software Programmer > Old Republic National Title Insurance Company > 400 Second Avenue South > Minneapolis, MN 55401 > (612) 371-1111 x480 > +--- > | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! > | To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com". > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com > | and specify 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message. > | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com > +--- > +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com". | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com | and specify 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.