Re: pdm vs year 2000

[Dave Mahadevan <mahadevan@xxxxxxxx>]

Neil Palmer wrote:
> 
> telsci wrote:
> >
> > The thing that's WRONG with this implementation is that we have spent time
> > and money working on a 50 year postponement of the problem.  Are we all
> > assuming the AS/400 will be obsolete by then?
> 
> Maybe not - but any source code you have from today that you would want
> to maintain with PDM probably would be obsolete (as would PDM?).   :-)

Neil,
Those COBOL programmers are still around! (I am told due to the
shortage, they are checking gravesites for some COBOL programmers to
resurrect for the Y2K projects).   PDM may have a new name but I am sure
the green terminal will still be around for PDM look alikes.


-- 
Thank You.

Regards

Dave Mahadevan.. mailto:mahadevan@fuse.net
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* This is the Midrange System Mailing List!  To submit a new message,   *
* send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".  To unsubscribe from     *
* this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com and specify            *
* 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message.  Questions      *
* should be directed to the list owner / operator: david@midrange.com   *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *