Re: QPROCT and QPRODT -- MI400

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: QPROCT and QPRODT
From: "James H. H. Lampert" <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 08:12:46 -0700
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/mi400>
List-help: <mailto:mi400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: MI Programming on the AS400 / iSeries <mi400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:mi400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mi400>, <mailto:mi400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mi400>, <mailto:mi400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Richard Thomas wrote:

"MXD is the same as POS and HI" - Agreed, when you look at the generated
code within a program. I'm not disputing this.

I naively expected QPRCRTPG to enforce instruction-specific synonyms for the
indicator/branch forms in the IRP (e.g. POS on ADDN is OK, but MXD and HI
aren't).

Why should it care, when the synonyms only exist for the purpose of making the source code easier for us lowly humans to read?

--
JHHL

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.