Re: QPROCT and QPRODT -- MI400

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: QPROCT and QPRODT
From: "James H. H. Lampert" <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 08:12:46 -0700
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/mi400>
List-help: <mailto:mi400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: MI Programming on the AS400 / iSeries <mi400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:mi400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mi400>, <mailto:mi400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mi400>, <mailto:mi400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Richard Thomas wrote:

"MXD is the same as POS and HI" - Agreed, when you look at the generated
code within a program. I'm not disputing this.

I naively expected QPRCRTPG to enforce instruction-specific synonyms for the
indicator/branch forms in the IRP (e.g. POS on ADDN is OK, but MXD and HI
aren't).

Why should it care, when the synonyms only exist for the purpose of making the source code easier for us lowly humans to read?

--
JHHL

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.