×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




Hmmm... let me see.

Actually the source in undelsrc.zip is the RISC source.  However, you
can't just compile it to get a running pgm.  You have to modify a
machine instruction with SST.  (This is what Leif calls "Naughty,
Naughty, Naughty" :-)  But since it's only ONE instruction, maybe it
only deserves one "Naughty".

BTW, I posted the source only for people's curiosity and amusement, at
the request of Gary Guthrie (may he rest in peace).

I originally made the number only 5 digits out of paranoia that people
would tie their machines in knots scanning for billions of records
interactively.  But as I get older, I get more libertarian, so what the
heck!

Let me look into this.

--Dave

On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 14:29, Dan Bale wrote: 
> Awesome utility, Dave!
> 
> Wondering if it would be possible to increase the number of records that can
> be scanned in one shot.  It doesn't seem like it would be a big deal, I
> think I saw how it could be done in the CISC-version source, but the RISC
> version didn't have the source.
> 
> Found the data area that is used to control that, and the 3-byte packed
> value.  I upped it from 100 to 99999.  But we're dealing with files with
> records in the millions.
> 
> I would most appreciate your assistance, if you so choose.
> 
> tia,
> db



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.