RE: RE:modify program object

| -----Original Message-----
| Behalf Of Jon Paris
| Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 1:37 PM

|  >> So I'm curious whether others on MI list would consider
| preempting this
| service program, too, and look at MI under ILE.
|
| For sure IBM would not be happy with this.

I would guess not, but I'd just be guessing.  (I sure DO know that Most
Every software agreement I've Ever seen disallows reverse-engineering, but
it seems to be done an awful lot anyway in all niches of the IT industry, so
I dunno?.?)

| W-code, MI-prime - or whatever
| one wants to call it is proprietary and fairly closely guarded.

What do you mean by "fairly closely guarded", Jon??  (IF you don't mind my
asking.)

My understanding of this was slightly different, as I've seen Several
sources (including you, Jon, iirc) say that the "W3", "W-cubed" (as I've
heard it called) "MI-prime" (THAT's a new one!) was available for a "mere"
$mill.  Is that no longer the case??  (Mebbe that's what you meant??)

| Jon Paris
| Partner400
| www.Partner400.com