× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



> From: Will Richards
>
> I'm writing a MI program which is suppose to replace an old and
> very slow C/400 that solves an ordinary differential equation. MI
> program works fine and A LOT MORE FASTER that C, :-). Looking for
> ways to improve speed and being familiar with RISC, I've patched
> the MI program and made it even faster. Now, the problem is how
> to deploy it to all our systems without being flagged as altered
> by the restore operation. My guess is, and please correct me if
> I'm wrong, if we recalculate the RISC instructions hash
> (Procedure table, offset X'009C' ) everything will be OK.

I'm unclear here.

You initially wrote the program, and now you're patching it?  Why not just
change the source and recompile it?  Instead, this sounds like you're trying
to alter system objects and then restore them as unaltered.

Or am I missing something?

Joe



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.