|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Everybody, ! First hardly any posts at all for two weeks and now this discussion! Per Leif's comment about the MI sledgehammer; I would like (as a neophyte MI guy, IMHO and all that), to suggest that MI is more like a laser; SQL is the sledgehammer. Now there's a tool that's r e a l l y dangerous! I was briefly in a forum discussion on iseriesnetwork.com the other day where someone wanted to know how you can access the stack (what program called me: a digital caller-id needed). Someone else says, yes there is a (new?) Api called QWVRCSTK that does just that. Wanting to impress at least s o m e b o d y , I said' yes and you can also do that in MI: only six program instructions (per Leif's original posting of GETOWNLIB). Someone came back with "you don't need MI; you can just call the C run-time functions with MI built-ins to do the same thing." I think the MI method is cleaner and probably slightly quicker; I'm not an &any_language_here& bigot, but why not use the best tool for the job. Of course, the Api call would for most of us be more comfortable and familiar. But, MI is more f u n. Of course, if we didn't (most of us) have to make a living with computers, life would really be a blast.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.