Re: [MI400] porting OS/400 compiler functionality to Windows...

[Dave McKenzie <davemck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Good point.  I presume it would, but I don't know at what release the change
was made.

--Dave

On Monday 01 July 2002 09:54 am, Steve Richter wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mi400-admin@midrange.com [mailto:mi400-admin@midrange.com]On
> Behalf Of Dave McKenzie
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:41 AM
> To: mi400@midrange.com
> Subject: Re: [MI400] porting OS/400 compiler functionality to Windows...
>
> >Point of worthless trivia:  The EDTLIBL CPP used to be QMNRPEDL, an RPG
>
> pgm,
>
> >but on V5R1 it isn't anymore.  However it's still there, suggesting the
> >question: what's it used for now (or is it just flotsam)?
>
> When I call qmnrpedl:
>
>  call     qmnrpedl
>  Object domain or hardware storage protection violation.
>  Error found on CALL command.
>
> If the edtlibl command was duplicated when on v4r5 would that duplicated
> command still work on v5r1 ?
>
> Steve