|
The SEPT itself or the pointer to the SEPT in the job? Either way that sucks. -Walden ------------ Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax WaldenL@TechSoftInc.com http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -----Original Message----- From: Leif Svalgaard [mailto:leif@leif.org] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 13:50 To: mi400@midrange.com Subject: Re: [MI400] V5R1 Memo to Users: "Control blocks more secure" From: <jamesl@hb.quik.com> > Fellow MI geeks: > The V5R1 Memo to Users includes this warning: > > In V5R1, > integrity protection for some system control blocks was improved. The only one I know of is that the SEPT can now longer be changed even by a system state program. _______________________________________________ This is the MI Programming on the AS400 / iSeries (MI400) mailing list To post a message email: MI400@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/mi400 or email: MI400-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/mi400.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
