|
On Thu, 14 February 2002, "Simon Coulter" wrote: > You wrote: > >Or that we feel the includes are like Redbook examples - look at them for > >an overall view but don't slavishly copy them into production code. > > This topic probably should be moved but I doubt it wil last long. > > I don't agree. The includes in QSYSINC should be used as is (unless > broken) -- especially the C language ones. The RPGIV ones are just a joke > and should be rewritten. I agree on all points with both sides. First, these often can't be used directly for production code because there are too many errors and omissions... so far. But I believe these _should_ be made as reliable as possible so that they can form a clear and useful standard, and obviously IBM needs to do it. Finally, yes, this is a wider issue than just MI, so it should be raised elsewhere. I nominate Buck to do it. :) Tom Liotta -- Tom Liotta The PowerTech Group, Inc. 19426 68th Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 Phone 253-872-7788 Fax 253-872-7904 http://www.400Security.com ___________________________________________________ The ALL NEW CS2000 from CompuServe Better! Faster! More Powerful! 250 FREE hours! Sign-on Now! http://www.compuserve.com/trycsrv/cs2000/webmail/
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
