|
I should have also pointed out that bulk files like image files are a good choice for IFS. Images can certainly be stored to advantage in the data base. But, if the main use of a given set of images is simply to be images on a web page, for instance, then IFS is a great choice, because they are readily accessed in other HTML that will point to them. Simple and usable. It may also simplify migration of HTML and images from various sorts of "web builder" tools. It can all be "zipped up" and then unzipped on the OS/400 side. In the actual example, I think someone said the images are stored on optical devices, which are inherently in IFS. Larry W. Loen - Senior Linux, Java, and iSeries Performance Analyst Dept HP4, Rochester MN
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.