|
(I didn't know that an OMI C compiler existed)
You really can't leave out the omi, nmi factor. OMI compilers produce MI
IRP, which is optimized based on a restrictive set of rules that inhibit
most/many classic optimizations. ILE compilers produce w-code, which was
designed for consumption by optimizing back ends. In terms of HLLs, I
think C is best suited for working with bits. (Java might work well, too.)
But enough on HLLs ... this is the MI400.
- Bob Donovan
On 12/20/2001 at 09:23:19 PM, mi400-admin@midrange.com wrote:
Leaving out the omi, nmi factor, if the OMI C compiler is used it
translates
the C code to MI correct ? Then the trusty translator translates the MI
IRP
code to risc code and optimizes it along the way. Where would C get its
advantage from ?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.