Re: Is there an easy way to scan for bits? -- MI400

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: [MI400] Is there an easy way to scan for bits?
From: "Leif Svalgaard" <leif@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 20:39:37 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/mi400/>
List-help: <mailto:mi400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: MI Programming on the AS400 / iSeries <mi400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:mi400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/mi400>,<mailto:mi400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/mi400>,<mailto:mi400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

From: Harry Williams <planesmart@teleteam.com>
> 000001100111 = 63

so TABLE(105) = 63.
Harry, is this approach clear?

The binary tree approach may generate fewer
RISC instructions to execute. You could also
use CPYBBTL which generates fewer instructions.
If you worry about performance at this level, you
should at the generated code.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Is there an easy way to scan for bits? , Harry Williams

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.