Re: [MI400] permanent spaces

["Leif Svalgaard" <leif@xxxxxxxx>]

can't be as that would pertain to ANY permanent object then.
Furthermore the authority bits are no longer in the pointer.

----- Original Message -----
From: Steve Glanstein <mic@aloha.com>
To: <mi400@midrange.com>
Cc: Leif Svalgaard <leif@leif.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 4:18 PM
Subject: RE: [MI400] permanent spaces


> I think it has something to do with the fact that the DOD standards for C2
> security require complete auditing of security authority, including its
> transfer between users.
>
> Security authority is in the pointer. Therefore the creation of permanent
> space objects would violate this principle.
>
> Steve Glanstein
> mic@aloha.com
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mi400-admin@midrange.com [mailto:mi400-admin@midrange.com]On
> > Behalf Of Leif Svalgaard
> > Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 8:52 AM
> > To: MI400 List
> > Subject: [MI400] permanent spaces
> >
> >
> > While we are the subject of spaces. why is it that permanent space
> > objects cannot be created by user state programs when the security
> > level is 40 or above?  where is the security breach?
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > This is the MI Programming on the AS400 / iSeries (MI400) mailing list
> > To post a message email: MI400@midrange.com
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/mi400
> > or email: MI400-request@midrange.com
> > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> > at http://archive.midrange.com/mi400.
> >
> >
>