|
From: Douglas Handy <dhandy1@bellsouth.net> > Agreed that 5250 tax is more accurate, and that is precisely why Joe's method is > acceptable -- nay, encouraged -- from a licensing viewpoint. Existing programs > are in essence converted to client/server, and the 400 is allowed unfettered > usage as the server. Joe is offloading the client UI presentation from the 400, > which is what the 5250 tax is all about. > > Fast400 does no such thing, based on your analysis of its operation. > true.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.