RE: iSeries NEWS knowledge of FAST400 method

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
          -
>It is a wonder that no-one has come out with such a product before.

Well (and this is a serious question - I'm not trying to be flip), why
not you, Leif?  Maybe you knew about this "technique", but didn't think
there was a market for it?  Or maybe it just didn't click for you like
it did for the developer of FAST400?

Or maybe, and I realize this is wild speculation, but that you would be
required by any "trade secret" agreement to deny it (so don't bother
<g>), but just maybe *you* are the developer!  Yeah, that's it!  <bg>

Then again, you probably wouldn't be writing a chapter in your ebook
about the 5250 flag in job threads if it was you, eh?

Dan Bale
IT - AS/400
Handleman Company
248-362-4400  Ext. 4952
D.Bale@Handleman.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leif Svalgaard [SMTP:leif@leif.org]
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:38 PM
> To:   mi400@midrange.com
> Subject:      Re: [MI400] iSeries NEWS knowledge of FAST400 method
>
> From: Steve Richter <srichter@AutoCoder.com>
> > CFINT has been factor on our system for some time. Have the
> technical
> > writers at iSeries NEWS speculated in the past on how to negate
> CFINT, do
> > they have theories on how FAST400 works?
>
> Steve, when someone asked what "reengineering" FAST400 would reveal
> my answer was: (I elaborate a bit here):
>
> Every job runs one or more threads. In each thread there is a bit
> set by the 5250 "drivers" every time the thread does 5250 I/O.
> Simply scan all threads and reset the bit if set and CFINT doesn't
> know about this job using 5250. No voodoo, no tricks, real simple.
> It is a wonder that no-one has come out with such a product before.
> Maybe FUD was a factor here? Certainly many posts to this list reek
> of FUD   :-)
>