× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: why the 16meg space size limit?
  • From: "Steve Richter" <srichter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 19:42:44 -0400

>> can I turn the question back on you?
>> why was it so important for ibm to provide teraspace functionality?
>
>You are welcome ;-)
>Many applications want to have data structures during processing which are
>larger than 16MB (JVM, for example). With 16MB limit one has to split these
>structures in smaller pieces, which is awkward. Teraspace solved this.
>Now if you want to store permanently vast amounts of data, you have (and
>always had!) several ways to do this.
>I've already mentioned database files and stream files.
>
>So I am back to my question - what is so special about *USRSPC object that
>you want it to be larger than 16MB ?


to answer your specific question, what about the list api's like quslobj?
Will the usrspc always have enough room for all the list entries?

It is basically a technical question re the system architecture. what are
its capabilities and limits.  what can be expected from it going into the
future. are there components of it that make it a dead end or will it be
able to evolve to meet tomorrows computing needs.

The decision to provide  teraspace functionality was a good opportunity to
expand the size limit of the space. This would have been a more seamless
solution than the teraspace.  But ibm did not do it this way.

Do you agree that expanding the space size limit would have been a better
way to provide teraspace functionality?

I learned what I know of computers by listening to ibm reasons for why the
s/38 architecture was best. single level store,  pointers with capability,
seamless migration to 64 bits, etc.  An effectively unlimited limit? ( 1
gig ) to the size of a space, is in my opinion, a logical and usefull
extension of this design concept.

I welcome the back and forth on this subject, but the question is still a a
technical one. What does it take, or what prevents the space size limit
extension.

Steve Richter




+---
| This is the MI Programmers Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MI400@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MI400-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MI400-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: dr2@cssas400.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.