RE: Seclvl40

["Steve Glanstein" <mic@xxxxxxxxx>]

Leif et al:

1.      Don't be too hard on Carol --- she has to deal with IBM management...

2.      If you think the performance impact at level 50 is bad, you should see
the performance impact of a damaged or destroyed system at level 30 or 40!

Steve Glanstein
mic@aloha.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-mi400@midrange.com [mailto:owner-mi400@midrange.com]On
> Behalf Of Leif Svalgaard
> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 5:01 AM
> To: MI400@midrange.com
> Subject: Re: Seclvl40
>
>
> > Does the need to use 40 have any coincidence with Carol turning 40?  So,
> > what happens when she turns 50?  We have to make sure we're all
> running at
> > 50?  Geez, I hope she opt's for a early out...I can just imagine the
> > performace impact if I have to run 60...:)
> >
>
> actually, the performance impact is not that great. Everyone should run at
> [at least :-)  ] 50.
>
>
> +---
> | This is the MI Programmers Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MI400@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MI400-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MI400-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
> dr2@cssas400.com
> +---
>

+---
| This is the MI Programmers Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MI400@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MI400-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MI400-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: dr2@cssas400.com
+---