Re: Detecting changing objects...

["Phil Hall" <hallp@xxxxxxxx>]

re-reading MATCTX, MATCTX also uses the object change list, so speed
should be fairly equal...

--phil


>
> > > do you mean that there is no need for such a utility?
> >
> > No. Your original question asked if the system provided the
> information
> > in an efficient manner.
> >
> > > Of course, there is a fast way of doing this. Use MATCTX
> > > with a selection of timestamp since. But, my question
> > > was: can the user easily and fast get this information?
> > > without actually saving all changed objects.
> >
> > Selection listing for the MATCTX (MATerialize Context - for those
new
> to
> > MI a context in MI normally means a library) is a exellent way to do
> > this.
> >
> > Also the QEZOLBKL API should be able to return the similar
> information,
> > but I've not checked the docs for the API yet, and *could* be faster
> as
> > it access the changed object list.
> >
> >
> > >>> before embarking on this let us get a consensus as to whether
> > >>> the system already provides this in an efficient manner, i.e.
> > >>> real time.
> > > >
> > > > Yes the system does this - can you imagine how (much ;-) slower
> > > > SAVCHGOBJ would be if the system didn't have a nice place to
> > retrieve
> > > > this information from...
> > > >
> > > > --phil
> > > >
> >
> >
>

+---
| This is the MI Programmers Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MI400@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MI400-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MI400-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: dr2@cssas400.com
+---