×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
FYI,
Found a bug in IM GL interface. When you are tailored to use Item Master cost for transactions, (SYSCTL/PDMREC position 128, value 0) the IW transaction uses the Unit cost Default from the Item Master, but the RW transaction uses the Unit cost Default from the latest revision, released or not... When the Value is 1, it uses the Values from Item Revision file for both, but does not pay attention to which one is actually released.
-----Original Message-----
From: mapics-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mapics-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eric Wolf
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 9:51 AM
To: mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [MAPICS-L] Cost transactions in COM-to-GL Interface
To all,
Which cost field is used to populate the CI** fields in the COM-to-GL Interface - Unit Cost Default, Current Unit Cost (from ItemasB) or Standard Unit Cost from Item Balance?
Thanks...
Eric
_________________________________________________________________
Climb to the top of the charts! Play the word scramble challenge with star power.
http://club.live.com/star_shuffle.aspx?icid=starshuffle_wlmailtextlink_jan
_______________________________________________
This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list To post a message email: MAPICS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
or email: MAPICS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
midrange.com
