×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




Hi Willie,

The relative relationship of the system pools appears ok.  So it is going to
depend upon a couple of things.  1. Which system are you running?  Prior to
the iSeries upgrades getting client applications to function quickly was a
chore, to say the least.  2. How many users?  Each client user will launch a
number of pre-fetch jobs that take up some memory.  

As for adjustments, the auto adjust features of AS/400 in R5 work very, very
well.

I guess another thought is this.  What does "poor performance" mean?  For
example, lets say I am comparing COM/Green Screen or EWP to CS/Client
Architecture.  While the CS screens do not "pop" up, they actually execute
much more information in a short period of time.  Even more so if your using
the template features, broadcast/receive, etc.

I've experienced green screen users that complain about the speed because it
takes about the same time as MS word to load; and then when measured,
actually increased productivity with a "slow" browser implementation.

Kevin Fox
kdfox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

-----Original Message-----
From: Willie J. Moore [mailto:WJMoore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 10:59 AM
To: MAPICS ERP System Discussion
Subject: RE: Poor system response time when Browsers/Integrator is started.

Kevin,
Here is the display:
                                               
 System    Pool    Reserved    Max             
  Pool   Size (M)  Size (M)  Active  Pool      
    1      135.33     69.42   +++++  *MACHINE  
    2      704.47      1.36     123  *BASE     
    3       15.43       .00       8  *SPOOL    
    4      158.09       .01      26  *INTERACT 
                                               
See anything that might need adjusting?
Willie..

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Fox [mailto:kdfox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 10:49 AM
To: 'MAPICS ERP System Discussion'
Subject: RE: Poor system response time when Browsers/Integrator is
started.


What is the system configuration?  How much of your memory is dedicated to
interactive vs. batch vs. system, etc.?

Kevin D. Fox
kdfox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

-----Original Message-----
From: Willie J. Moore [mailto:WJMoore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 7:57 AM
To: mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Poor system response time when Browsers/Integrator is started.

Whenever we start up Browser our system response times slow way down. Even
after Browser is up and running, the response does not improve. I would like
to know if anyone is having or has had this problem, and if so how was it
corrected.

We have also tried to automate the start/stop procedures:
                                                     
PSICTLJVS  REQUEST(*LIST) ENVLIST(MM) CTLOPT(*START)

PSICTLJVS  REQUEST(*LIST) ENVLIST(MM) CTLOPT(*END) + 
             GLBSRV(*YES)                            

This is not working either.

Any suggestions or advice would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
William Moore





_______________________________________________
This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MAPICS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
or email: MAPICS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.







This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.