|
To all, Here is the scenario my customer has: When they offer a promotion, they sometimes (as a part of the promo) give a 30 day extension to the customer's terms. Here is the problem - when you override the terms from 30 days to 60 days, COM handles it like this: 1) Changes the Terms code in the Open Order files 2) When it gets shipped/invoiced, the printed Invoice states the new terms description, the MBF9REP record has the new Net Due Days BUT 3) The printed invoice only uses the Customer Master terms days to calculate the Net Due Date which gets passed to AR. 4) Now the Credit person sees from AR reports and Inquiries that the invoice is past due when it really is not. MAPICS states "that is the way it has always been" and that I should either use the Closings Before Current flag or key in the Invoice Date on the Order. Does anyone else run into this "design flaw"? Why give us the ability of overriding the Terms and not bother to use them except for printing the description. TIA... Eric
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.