× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Our firm provides Performance analysis to help determine what is the 
correct path to assist in planning as well as actual real time mapping to 
the correct IBM systems. We utilize toolsets and provide colorful 
graphical reports  that easily explain bottlenecks and what needs to be 
done to remove them.

We charge a small fee which is 100% refundable upon purchase of the 
recommended solution from us. 

Please call or email for samples we have done for other clients...

We are one of IBM's largest and fastest growing Premier Business Partners, 
have office nationwide and have been in business since 1987...

Mitchell K. Kleinman
Executive Vice President
CCS - an IBM Premier Business Partner
949-476-0874 (Main)
949-261-3298 (Direct)
949-261-9164 (Office Fax)
425-940-1954 (eFax)
Mitch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




mapics-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
Sent by: mapics-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
09/24/2003 10:01 AM
Please respond to
mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx


To
mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
cc

Subject
MAPICS-L Digest, Vol 1, Issue 762






Send MAPICS-L mailing list submissions to
                 mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
                 http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
                 mapics-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx

You can reach the person managing the list at
                 mapics-l-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of MAPICS-L digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Question Re: Browser response time. (Mike Bennett)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

message: 1
date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:53:28 -0500
from: "Mike Bennett" <mbennett@xxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: Question Re: Browser response time.

That is very good advice Greg.
Finding out the real problem may even cost $$ but what
  if you buy a bigger system and it's still slow ???
IBM business partners have analysis tools for the iSeries and some
    even have good network advisors.

Mike Bennett - Information Services Manager
Kimray Inc.
52 NW 42nd Street
Oklahoma City, OK 73118
405-525-6601
www.kimray.com
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Greg Novak, Momentum" <gnovak@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'MAPICS ERP System Discussion'" <mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:21 AM
Subject: RE: Question Re: Browser response time.


> The question in any processor upgrade is what resource is the most
> constrained?  If you are consistently running above 70% processor
> utilization, then a processor upgrade should help.  If your disk
utilization
> is over 70-80 percent, adding disk may help.  If your disk is thrashing 
-
> lots of paging and faults (WRKSYSSTS), then get expert advice.
>
> What constitutes a lot of thrashing?  Maybe someone else here can help, 
I
> have seen some relative numbers but they are just guidelines (as are the
> percentages above).  Additionally, you may be able to just realign the
> memory pool sizes and see some benefits there too - check the setting 
for
> performance adjustment - system value QPFRADJ.
>
> Throwing more processor at a problem does not solve anything if your
biggest
> constraint is a different resource - disk, memory, etc.
>
> Regards,
> -Greg
>
> Gregory Novak
> Manager North American Technical Services
> Momentum Utilities Pty Ltd
> (630) 985-1736
> gnovak@xxxxxxxxxx
> www.jacana.com
>
> Making Information Work for your Business
> www.intuator.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: meyno [mailto:meyno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:53 AM
> To: MAPICS-L SUBMIT
> Subject: Question Re: Browser response time.
>
>
> We are using Browser 6.0 and have a 720, with cpw of 420.  (#2062)
>
> If I upgrade my CPW to 810 (#2063) or 1600 (#2064) and not doing any 
other
> hardware upgrade,  Will my Browser response time improve?
>
> I'm doing a lot of other stuff to improve response time, but will the
above
> do the job.
>
> Do I stay in the P10 group?
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MAPICS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
> or email: MAPICS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
>


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) digest list
To post a message email: MAPICS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
or email: MAPICS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.



End of MAPICS-L Digest, Vol 1, Issue 762
****************************************


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.