another thought. You could also use one of the 4 extra buckets mapics
offeres (these are cost / piece buckets, not %) in the item b-rec and decide
whether or not to participate in matl, labor or OH cost, or just roll by
itself.
jeff snyder, CPIM
mapics consultant
From: "Bob Tenney" <bobtenney@earthlink.net>
Reply-To: MAPICS ERP System Discussion <mapics-l@midrange.com>
To: "MAPICS ERP System Discussion" <mapics-l@midrange.com>
Subject: Re: Adding standard fixed costs to Item Process
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 20:26:44 -0500
Joan, Perhaps you should treat this as a pricing problem rather than a
costing problem. If you approach it this way there are at least two
solutions
1 - Have COM calculate the price from the standard cost and increase the
markup to reflect anticipated scrap.
2 - Put the anticipated scrap cost in an ITEMAS user field and then use
queries or COM exits to add this cost to the standard cost for pricing
purposes.
Both of these solutions give your pricing people the information that they
need to do their jobs without messing with the routings or BOM.
Bob Tenney
828-526-8976
MAPICS - FRx - Crystal Reports
Visit www.tenneypubs.com for books about
IFM, COM, G/L Interfaces
Info WorkPlace, and FRx
_______________________________________________
This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MAPICS-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
or email: MAPICS-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at
http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.