Re: Disk space required for an environment update

["Pete" <peteo@xxxxxxxx>]

Bryan,
    I assume you are talking about your test env... Which is just for
testing and training???  Correct!!!!!!!!   I would be real careful about
just doing a clear file in the live inv...... Com has records in so many
files that you may leave some records hanging and cause you some real
problems... Files like APHSTS and ARHSTS, IMHIST, PRHSTD, PRHSTS... Again,,,
I am assume only the test env is being cleared.. I would not do a clear in
the live env....

Pete Olshavsky
Ind. Mapics Programmer/Systems Analyst
Available for short term Projects
peteo@htol.net


----- Original Message -----
From: Burns, Bryan <burnsbm@Echoincorporated.com>
To: <mapics-l@midrange.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:14 AM
Subject: RE: Disk space required for an environment update


> Thanks Dave, you confirmed my suspicions.
>
> A programmer is suggesting we just do a CLRPFM on the COM order history
> files in the test environment(we have about 8 to 10 million records in
order
> history), instead of using the MAPICS delete order shipments option.  Do
you
> see any problems with this?  It should run faster and we would not have to
> do a reorg this way either.
>
>
>
> Bryan,
>
> What it does is save each library to a save file in QTEMP, without
> compression, so effectively it is making a copy of AMFLIBx.  I would do
some
> purging, 70% of 120 = 84, add 27 and you're at 111 - uncomfortably close
for
> me (I'm a pessimist whenever Murphy's Law might apply - grin).
>
> Dave Shaw
> MAPICS-L Moderator
> Rauch Industries, Inc.
> Gastonia, NC
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Burns, Bryan [mailto:burnsbm@Echoincorporated.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 9:23 AM
> To: 'MAPICS-L@midrange.com'
> Subject: Disk space required for an environment update
>
>
> When an update environment is submitted, does MAPICS copy one of the
> environments first?
>
> When I did an update in June, it was successful but there was a CPF0907
> message during the update that said "SERIOUS STORAGE CONDITION MAY EXIST.
> THE AMOUNT OF AUXILIARY STORAGE IN THE AUXILIARY STORAGE POOL HAS REACHED
> THE THRESHOLD VALUE.  STORAGE CAPACITY IS (120GB) STORAGE USED IS (108
GB).
> The best I remember is that we were at 60 or 70% of 120 GB in the ASP
before
> I submitted the update.
>
> Some time soon, I  need to do another update of our test environment (TS)
> from our production environment (TE), both of which are 27gb.  We are at
70%
> of 120gb of ASP right now.  Do I need to do some purging first?
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MAPICS-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/mapics-l
> or email: MAPICS-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
>
>