|
Dale - I'm with you! Especially since you can't "load" data into the MO user fields without customizing the MO release programs - in that case, what are the fields there for? I've written ump-teen IWP MO reports (including a replacement for the labor tickets and shop packet) so that the data we store in the EPDM Item master files are visible to the shop floor personnel. But so much for going "PaperLess." You write the enhancement request - I'll definately support it! Cheers - Joan Joan McCready, IS Manager phone: 636-479-4499 MetalTek International fax: 636-479-3399 The Carondelet Division www.metaltekint.com 8600 Commercial Blvd Pevely, MO 63070 -----Original Message----- From: Dave Shaw [mailto:daveshaw@bellsouth.net] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 7:20 PM To: MAPICS-L Subject: Fw: User-defined fields in MAPICS Forwarded for Dale: ----- Original Message ----- From: <DaleGindlesperger@fft-inc.com> To: <mapics-l-admin@midrange.com> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:54 AM Subject: User-defined fields in MAPICS > This is a general question/comment for the thread members. > > We use "user-defined fields" in the product structure files and other > files to help support non-MAPICS functionality, such as union information > requirements (labor standard type, etc). When orders are released, the > user-defined fields don't go over from the master files to the order files > (ie., User Code A in PSTDTL doesn't go to MODATA). It seems odd to me > that we are forced to write blaster programs to load the user fields to > the "work" files from the "master" files and either have them as triggers > or insert them into the CLs. > > Here's where it is a question as well as a comment. Have I been missing > something in MAPICS that you can tell the system to copy the user fields > over in order release and such? Or is this a "functioning as designed"? > If so, does it seem odd to you good people on the thread that they don't > go over? > > I was going to write this up as an enhancement request, but if I am the > only person that wants user fields to copy from the "master" to the "work" > files, or if it will mess up other people's enhancements, I probably won't > bother. > > Any comments one way or the other are welcome.... > > Dale @ Fleetwood > _______________________________________________ This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list To post a message email: MAPICS-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/mapics-l or email: MAPICS-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.