Bob, Thanks. This is exactly what we did to correct this problem. I appreciate your quick response. Patrick > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Tenney [SMTP:firstname.lastname@example.org] > Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 1:42 AM > To: MAPICS-L@midrange.com > Subject: RE: items found in production that have already been RM-ed > > Patrick, I assume that you are very time-constrained and that you are > valuing inventory at standard cost. Your best approach is to forget about > those messed-up MO's and focus on getting the physical inventory right. > The resulting physical inventory adjustments will undo the MO errors.. If > you use this approach be careful about two things: (1) Component items > issued to MO's that have not been consumed should be returned to stock and > included in the physical inventory; (2) Do not change your standard costs > until you have updated MAPICS to reflect the physical. > > Once you get past the crisis, issue new MOs for the items that were on the > closedout MOs but not actually manufactured. > > Bob Tenney > Bob Tenney Solutions, LLC > email@example.com <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org> > 404-373-5669 > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Shrader, Patrick <mailto:email@example.com> > To: Mapics Mailing List <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org> > Sent: 01/28/01 12:49:57 AM > Subject: items found in production that have already been RM-ed > > > We are in the middle of a physical inventory, and have run across a > situation that unfortunately affects a lot of items on the floor. We > have to > prevent this mistake in the future, but, unfortunately, I have to > fix its > problems today. > > Several MOs have production keyed (RMs) against them, and the MO has > been > closed out, when in fact the production is not complete. For > example, an MO > has been set up, PC/IP-ed, RM-ed, and closed. Now at inventory time > we > discover that the production is not actually done for this item, but > it was > keyed into the system as if it were. > > My suggestion is to open the MO again, and do a negative RM. > However, the > concern is that this will cause bigger problems without the > supporting PC/IP > transactions. Will this work, or is there a better way? > > We update inventory in Batch mode, if that makes any difference (I > can't use > the "R" completion code, for instance, that seems like it may work). > > Patrick Shrader > White Knight > > > +--- > | This is the MAPICS Mailing List! > | To submit a new message, send your mail to MAPICS-L@midrange.com. > <mailto:MAPICS-L@midrange.com.> > | To subscribe to this list send email to MAPICS-L-SUB@midrange.com. > <mailto:MAPICS-L-SUB@midrange.com.> > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to > MAPICS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. <mailto:MAPICS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.> > | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: > email@example.com <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org> > +--- > > > > > > > > Bob Tenney > Bob Tenney Solutions, LLC > 404-373-5669 > +--- | This is the MAPICS Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MAPICS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MAPICS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAPICS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: email@example.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.