×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
hi Robin,
On 2/9/2010 5:30 AM, Robin Wenham wrote:
There is not a problem with wireless coverage holes in this area: it is
well covered.
In my experience, it's more likely to be the opposite problem:
wireless coverage overlap.
I've had a *ton* of performance problems where two wireless networks
overlap, but have been configured to run on the same channel number.
This is getting more and more common now that everyone in the world
seems to have their own wireless network.
If you have two networks in one spot where both are set up as (for
example) channel 11, then the devices are constantly checking which
network to send the data to. Often times, they are switching from
network to network repeatedly, causing huge performance problems.
The solution is to keep the channel numbers as far apart as you can. If
you have two overlapping networks, set one to channel 1, and one to
channel 11. Much less interference. If there's another one in the
area that the devices might hit, set it to channel 6. Try to keep them
as far apart, numerically, as you can.
That's been my experience, anyway.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
