Our lib5250 is already a "5250 emulation API", why reinvent the wheel? On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 MarkB@cms400.com wrote: > Hi, sorry if this is offtopic... > I'm working on a 5250 emulation API. Most of the work has been done, but I > am experiencing cursor positioning problems, and noticed in the archives > that this seems to be a common issue. > > Looking through the tn5250j emulator code, I noticed that IC and MC orders > are treated the same (so it's broken there as well). > > I also looked through the TN5250 code, but still apparently can't figure > out my problem. > Could someone give me a consice set of rules for cursor placement used in > TN5250? I've been working on this for a while so I "speak the language". > I do have the "Function Reference" but you all know that this is a terrible > reference from an implementation standpoint. > > Any help would be much appreciated. > > > Mark. > markb > at > cms400 > dot > com > > P.S. Thanks for TN5250. > > _______________________________________________ > This is the Linux 5250 Development Project (LINUX5250) mailing list > To post a message email: LINUX5250@midrange.com > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/linux5250 > or email: LINUX5250firstname.lastname@example.org > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/linux5250. >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.