× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. LINUX5250
  3. February 2002

GPL vs. OpenSSL license

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news about laws etc. again, but I've
realised that, due to the interaction between the advertising clause
in the OpenSSL license (conditions 3 and 6), and section 6 of the GNU
GPL, nobody is actually allowed to distribute binaries of tn5250.

This applies to the license on tn5250.c; I'm not sure how it interacts
with the sort-of-GPL on the source for lib5250, but I think the
exception just defers to the license on tn5250.c.

The only way out of this, as far as I know, is for the copyright
holder(s) of the GPL bits of tn5250 to change the license.
Possibilities are to use a less restrictive license like the LGPL (or
MIT or BSD license) instead, or to add an exception for OpenSSL like
some of KDE has for Qt.

--
         Carey Evans  http://home.clear.net.nz/pages/c.evans/

                             Cavem canus.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.