On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 05:51:02PM -0500, Scott Klement wrote:
>
> (Here I am replying to myself)
>
> Err... what I actually COULD do, instead of select()ing for both read
> and write in terminal_waitevent, I could just not return from get_byte
> until SSL_read returns SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ.   It might make the ssl
> module a bit "greedy" when a re-negotiation is requested...  but it
> would make it possible to keep all the ssl-specific code in the sslstream
> module.
>
> I think I'll do it that way.  (I wish I had thought of that earlier)

I wouldn't go through all that trouble to avoid hacking the terminal for a
write FD.  We might not get away so easy when/if Linux-SNA and SNA-Over-IP are
implemented.

>
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Scott Klement wrote:
>
> >
> > But I would...  because of the write fds...   though, it'd probably work
> > "most of the time," if I didn't... :)
> >
>

-Jay 'Eraserhead' Felice


This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].