|
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 05:51:02PM -0500, Scott Klement wrote: > > (Here I am replying to myself) > > Err... what I actually COULD do, instead of select()ing for both read > and write in terminal_waitevent, I could just not return from get_byte > until SSL_read returns SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ. It might make the ssl > module a bit "greedy" when a re-negotiation is requested... but it > would make it possible to keep all the ssl-specific code in the sslstream > module. > > I think I'll do it that way. (I wish I had thought of that earlier) I wouldn't go through all that trouble to avoid hacking the terminal for a write FD. We might not get away so easy when/if Linux-SNA and SNA-Over-IP are implemented. > > On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Scott Klement wrote: > > > > > But I would... because of the write fds... though, it'd probably work > > "most of the time," if I didn't... :) > > > -Jay 'Eraserhead' Felice
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
