Scott Klement <email@example.com> writes: > True, /bin/sh is not bash on FreeBSD. However, I wasn't having the > problem that Carey was describing.... It's quite possible that the *BSD sh has been improved since someone from Debian ported it to Linux and called it "ash", more than three years ago: } This is a very simple port of ash taken from NetBSD-current on } 1997/06/18. The file setmode.c was taken from src/libc/gen and is } needed since the Linux libc does provide getmode(3) or setmode(3). } History editing is disabled to avoid code bloat. This also means that } building the package is possible without the BSD libedit. The man page looks just the same as the NetBSD sh(1) man page I found online, though. -- Carey Evans http://home.clear.net.nz/pages/c.evans/ +--- | This is the LINUX5250 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to LINUX5250@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to LINUX5250-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to LINUX5250-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: firstname.lastname@example.org +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.