× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: gtk-5250 & gnome-5250
  • From: Scott Klement <klemscot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 17:56:45 -0500 (CDT)


Hi Jay,

I just did a cvs update, and the gnome-5250 thing is now working properly!  
wooohoo!  (without crashing with the segfault)

On Mon, 22 May 2000, Jason M. Felice wrote:

> > A few small problems:
> > 
> > 1)  If I click the properties dialog, and got a segmentation fault.
> >      Since I'm running FreeBSD, this is probably another one of those
> >      issues where it doesnt show up in Linux, because Linux always
> >      initializes its memory when allocated.
> > 
> >      In gtk-5250, its occurring around line 355 of gtk5250propdlg.c,
> >      on this statement:
> > 
> >        gtk_font_selection_set_font_name (GTK_FONT_SELECTION
> >            (This->font_selector), This->font_name_80);
> > 
> >      The gnome-5250 version doesn't appear to dump core, so I'll have
> >      to do a bit more research if its not happening at the same spot :)
> 
> That's strange.  There shouldn't be any difference in behavior between
> the Gnome and the GTK+ version.  I'm looking at the code and really
> don't have an explanation for you...  Everything _is_ initialized
> properly.
> 

There wasn't any difference in behavior in YOUR code... they both crashed
with segmentation fault when I did the same things.  The difference was in
the fact that the gtk version dumped core, whereas the gnome version just
said "Segmentation Fault" and didn't create a core image.

But, at any rate, the problem already appears to have been fixed :)


> > 2) There are certain 5250 keys that I can't figure out how to do in either
> >      the gnome-5250 or gtk-5250 versions.   Field+, backtab, etc.  Is
> >      there a way to send these?
> 
> (hack hack hack...) Okay, Field+/Field- are now the number keypad's
> +/- keys. Field exit is also mapped to keypad enter. Backtab is
> Shift+Tab. Shift+Esc is System request, Esc is Attention. All numbers
> on keypad work.  '*' and '/' on keypad produce those characters (is
> that right for a dumb terminal).
> 

Well, perhaps I'm just weird, but Field+ doesnt work for me.  At least,
not the way I expect it to work.   The Keypad's + key causes nothing to
happen...   the + key on the regular keyboard (as opposed to the keypad) 
does work, but only in numeric fields.   (I tend to use Field+ in lieu of
Field Exit on character fields, just by habit, and it really messes me up)

Field- does work from the keypad...  

Thanks for the +bassackwards switch.  :)  I use my computer for other
things besides 5250 emulation, and I'm very used to the ENTER key being
the ENTER key.  I don't really think thats backwards... :)



+---
| This is the LINUX5250 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to LINUX5250@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to LINUX5250-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to LINUX5250-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.