destructive backspace

[Sean Porterfield <sporter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> There seems to be a comflict in ideas concerning the 'backspace' key.  In 
>Client
> Access/400 the
> Backspace key is a 'destructive' backspace.  In the 3476, 3477, 3486, 3487
> world, it's a
> 'backspace' non-destructive.

That is mappable in Client Access and can be non-destructive.  I actually used 
both
- destructive most of the time (I'm a DOS user at heart) but shift-backspace was
non-destructive for me so I could get from the first position of one field to 
the
last position of the previous field.  (I'm a lazy typist; the fewer keys to hit,
the better!)


+---
| This is the LINUX5250 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to LINUX5250@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to LINUX5250-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to LINUX5250-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---