I have used the EA version for quit some months- and everything works just
great! Even JPA / hibernate. I have however not had time to look at
performance/ mem use. But Java 11 actually works just fine!

tir. 20. apr. 2021 kl. 17.15 skrev David Gibbs via JAVA400-L <
java400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

Folks:

Has anyone worked with JT400 using newer Java implementations (greater
than Java 8)?

I'm not particularly concerned about using it ON IBM i ... mostly
Windows & Linux.

How well did it work? Any problems?

Thanks!

david
--
I'm riding in the American Diabetes Association's Tour de Cure to raise
money for diabetes research, education, advocacy, and awareness. You
can make a tax-deductible donation to my ride by visiting
https://mideml.diabetessucks.net.

You can see where my donations come from by visiting my interactive
donation map ... https://mideml.diabetessucks.net/map (it's a geeky
thing).
--
This is the Java Programming on and around the IBM i (JAVA400-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: JAVA400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l
or email: JAVA400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: https://amazon.midrange.com


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2021 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.