Re: Java startup performance -- JAVA400-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Java startup performance
From: Sam_L <lennon_s_j@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 13:31:24 -0400
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/java400-l/>
List-help: <mailto:java400-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Java Programming on and around the IBM i <java400-l.lists.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:java400-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/java400-l>, <mailto:java400-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Leaving aside the long start up time, maybe you could avoid the connection failure by putting into the CL, ahead of your current call, a call to a Java program that does essentially nothing. This should get the JVM initialized.

Sam

On 3/18/2019 12:50 PM, Duncan McManus wrote:

Hi

This is essentially what is happening. It is called once from a simple CL program using the 'Java' command, and runs all day communicating via data queues with RPG programs.

I just don't understand why the AS400 is so slow to startup, when a PC can do it in a fraction of the time.

Thanks
Duncan

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.