Re: Fwd: Physical and *DDM *DTAQ on the same system?

I'm doing it to avoid changing code, having all of that work it's way up
the DEV food-chain, etc. Basically get a hole fixed in our application
right away until I figure out a good way to get it repaired long-term.

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 9:16 AM David Gibbs via JAVA400-L <
java400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 3/12/2019 8:56 AM, Kelly Beard wrote:

Can I do this? I want to have a DDM *DTAQ in one library that points
to a physical one in another library.

Why do you want to do that?

Seems to me that it would make more sense to just write to the physical
data queue instead of adding an extra layer.

david



--
IBM i on Power Systems: For when you can't afford to be out of business!

I'm riding 615 miles (Yes, you read that right) in the American Diabetes
Association's Tour de Cure to raise money for diabetes research, education,
advocacy, and awareness. You can make a tax-deductible donation to my ride
by visiting https://mideml.diabetessucks.net.

You can see where my donations come from by visiting my interactive
donation map ... https://mideml.diabetessucks.net/map (it's a geeky
thing).

I may have diabetes, but diabetes doesn't have me!
--
This is the Java Programming on and around the IBM i (JAVA400-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: JAVA400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l
or email: JAVA400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: https://amazon.midrange.com