× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Hi David

Customer tells me they are on 7.3.

Thanks
Matt

Sent from my iPhone

On 12 Nov 2018, at 18:00, java400-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Send JAVA400-L mailing list submissions to
java400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
java400-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx

You can reach the person managing the list at
java400-l-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of JAVA400-L digest..."


Today's Topics:

1. RE: JDBC with Kerberos authentication? (Justin Taylor)
2. Unexpected JVM crash, assistance requested (Matt Pryor)
3. Re: Unexpected JVM crash, assistance requested (David Gibbs)
4. Domino HTTPJVMMaxHeapSize (Rob Berendt)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

message: 1
date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 13:47:29 +0000
from: Justin Taylor <JUSTIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: RE: JDBC with Kerberos authentication?

For posterity, here's my working sample https://github.com/Justin-E-Taylor/jt400_kerberos.

Thanks



------------------------------

message: 2
date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:16:36 +0000
from: Matt Pryor <pryor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Unexpected JVM crash, assistance requested

Hi there

JVM specifics below:

java version "1.8.0_181"


Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 8.0.5.20 -
pap3280sr5fp20-20180802_01(SR5 FP20))

IBM J9 VM (build 2.9, JRE 1.8.0 OS/400 ppc-32-Bit 20180731_393394 (JIT
enabled, AOT enabled)


The JVM appears to crash with the following entry in the job log:


Message . . . . : Object domain or storage protection error for
offset
X'00000000024941E0' in object QJVACMDSRVTLXDRIVER
907159.
Cause . . . . . : A program tried to use a blocked instruction, access
a
system domain object, or make invalid use of a protected page. The
violation
type is 3. The violation type indicates the type of error: 1-Object
domain
violation. 2-Test Pointer Target Addressability (TESTPTA) violation.
3-Read

protection error.

Has anyone experienced anything similar or able to point to any
suggestions? Please let me know any other information I can provide.

Many thanks


--
Matt Pryor
Software Developer

The International Presence Group of Companies
EMAIL: pryor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
URL: www.International-presence.com


------------------------------

message: 3
date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:25:19 -0600
from: David Gibbs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: Unexpected JVM crash, assistance requested

On 11/12/2018 10:16 AM, Matt Pryor wrote:
Message . . . . : Object domain or storage protection error for
offset X'00000000024941E0' in object QJVACMDSRVTLXDRIVER 907159.
Cause . . . . . : A program tried to use a blocked instruction,
access a system domain object, or make invalid use of a protected
page. The violation type is 3. The violation type indicates the type
of error: 1-Object

What OS version?

david

--
David Gibbs
midrange.com

IBM i on Power Systems: For when you can't afford to be out of business!

I'm riding 615 miles (Yes, you read that right) in the American Diabetes Association's Tour de Cure to raise money for diabetes research, education, advocacy, and awareness. You can make a tax deductible donation to my ride by visiting https://lsteml.diabetessucks.net.

See where I get my donations from ... visit https://lsteml.diabetessucks.net/map for an interactive map (it's a geeky thing).

I may have diabetes, but diabetes doesn't have me!


------------------------------

message: 4
date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 11:25:53 -0500
from: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
subject: Domino HTTPJVMMaxHeapSize

I have a Java question about Domino.
I have a notes.ini setting which works differently on one lpar than on
another. I can understand the possibilities: Memory differences, etc.
From the case:
<snip>
The default for os400 is 1G for all defaults so it is not clear on why we
got a 256 meg setting, the only way that could happen is if
HTTPJVMMaxHeapSize does not exist or cannot be found and the other JVM
setting for the Agent manager is set JavaMaxHeapSize=256, then
HTTPJVMMaxHeapSize will be set to the JavaMaxHeapSize.
This setting is not touched if it already exists, if the setting does not
exist it will be initialized to something (either the default of 1 gig or
if JavaMaxHeapSize.is present then the value specified by JavaMaxHeapSize.
With regard to the 4G setting failing, the reason for that is the JVM will
try and allocate the heap (4g) at startup, if it cannot allocate that much
memory then one will get a too large setting, the possibility is that the
OS400 JVM may be limited to 2 gig heap, one could try and specify 2148M
(instead of 2048) and see if that works, if that works then the issue will
be the JVM could not allocate a 4G heap.
</snip>

Both lpars are IBM i 7.3 at same PTF levels.
Both are Power 9's. One is on a 41A and the other is on a 42A. The 42A
works at 4G, the 41A only works at 2G. Both lpars are setup for Domino.
QCTLSBSD = QBASE.

DSPSYSSTS

42A:
Sys Pool Reserved Max ------DB------- ----Non-DB-----
Pool Size M Size M Act Faults Pages Faults Pages
1 2217.94 1148.35 +++++ .0 .0 .0 .0
2 28467.86 12.14 393 .0 .0 .0 4.2
3 1645.16 .00 82 .0 .0 2.4 2.6
4 81.02 .00 5 .0 .0 .0 .0

41A:
System Pool Reserved Max -------DB------- -----Non-DB-----
Pool Size (M) Size (M) Active Faults Pages Faults Pages
1 8102.97 1184.71 +++++ .0 .0 .0 .0
2 19086.12 16.43 373 .0 .0 .0 .0
3 4898.78 .00 163 .0 .0 4.0 5.2
4 324.11 .00 5 .0 .0 .0 .0

Is there some other Java setting I am missing?


Rob Berendt
--
IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1
Group Dekko
Dept 1600
Mail to: 2505 Dekko Drive
Garrett, IN 46738
Ship to: Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com




------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

--
This is the Java Programming on and around the IBM i (JAVA400-L) digest list
To post a message email: JAVA400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l
or email: JAVA400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: https://amazon.midrange.com


------------------------------

End of JAVA400-L Digest, Vol 16, Issue 60
*****************************************

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.