On 7/1/13 1:48 PM, Dan Kimmel wrote:
If you really must, you can use the record-level access classes of
JT400 such as com.ibm.as400.access.KeyedFile. This is *NOT* JDBC, of
course.

Except that accessing DB2/400 via a JDBC connection, through Scott's JDBCR4 interface, is an act of "carrying coals to Newcastle," and useful only in the very early development stage. The object is not to write a Java program to access DB2/400, but rather to use JDBC calls sent through JDBCR4 to access databases (most likely NOT DB2/400) on other boxes.

I've made no secret of the fact that I personally can't imagine why anybody would want such a singularly useless capability in the first place, or why our competitors have bothered with adding that capability to their product, and yet we've actually had requests for it.

--
JHHL

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.