On 7/1/13 1:48 PM, Dan Kimmel wrote:
If you really must, you can use the record-level access classes of
JT400 such as com.ibm.as400.access.KeyedFile. This is *NOT* JDBC, of

Except that accessing DB2/400 via a JDBC connection, through Scott's JDBCR4 interface, is an act of "carrying coals to Newcastle," and useful only in the very early development stage. The object is not to write a Java program to access DB2/400, but rather to use JDBC calls sent through JDBCR4 to access databases (most likely NOT DB2/400) on other boxes.

I've made no secret of the fact that I personally can't imagine why anybody would want such a singularly useless capability in the first place, or why our competitors have bothered with adding that capability to their product, and yet we've actually had requests for it.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.